ALL, (01)
To make sure this discourse is broadly shared and understood among the
entire community (and not just a insider conversation), would everyone
expand on acronyms and provide references, if at all possible ... for
acronyms/terms like "BIM" "CETC-Sofi." (02)
Thanks. =ppy
-- (03)
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Bob Smith <bobsmithttl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks, Deb and Jack
>
>
> Recapping:
>
> Jack asks: What % of your need is satisfied by the BIM working group?
>
> Deb believes about 30%...of need, and full scale smart cities (as the
> CETC-Sofi team is attempting to formalize) 5%
>
> Would a Feb. conversation be helpful to consider how to think about
> "Benchmarking" these terms?
>
> Regards,
>
> Bob (04)
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Debmacp <debmacp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> For our industry needs about 30%, for full scale smart cities and the
>> planet, less than 5%
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone (05)
>> On Jan 21, 2012, at 1:09 AM, Jack Ring <jring7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > Deb,
>> > What % of your need is satisfied by the BIM working group? (06)
>> > On Jan 20, 2012, at 8:43 PM, Debmacp wrote:
>> >
>> >> The architecture/engineering/products domain is in desperate need of
>> >> ontology to connect energy, healthcare, emergency management, financial,
>and
>> >> actually nature - the non man made aspects in other discussions.
>> >>
>> >> We have solid classification systems and some ok vocabularies to offer,
>> >> but the larger issue is the big system need for organization,
>consolidation,
>> >> semantic discipline
>> >>
>> >> ...and something that really works in real world buildings like
>> >> hospitals and research labs
>> >>
>> >> Deb MacPherson
>> >>
>> >> Sent from my iPhone (07)
>> >> On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:49 PM, "Steve Ray (CMU)" <steve.ray@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Dear Colleagues,
>> >>> On behalf of the "Large-scale Domain Applications" track (Track 4)
>> >>> of the Ontology Summit we would like to share with you what this track
>> >>> is
>> >>> trying to bring out. As you may be aware, some of the other tracks and
>> >>> cross-track conversations will be talking about the practice of
>> >>> systems
>> >>> engineering, or quality issues, or about engineered systems in
>> >>> general. This
>> >>> track is designed to bring to the table some real-world examples from
>> >>> the
>> >>> perspective of any of a number of application domains. So, for
>> >>> example, one
>> >>> conversation might be about how large scale systems in the biomedical
>> >>> domain
>> >>> have used ontologies to meet their requirements. Or, we might be
>> >>> talking
>> >>> about how the smart grid "system" could be using ontology for better
>> >>> interoperability among utilities. Or, how U.S. government systems are
>> >>> using
>> >>> ontology to connect the dots among agencies. But most importantly, we
>> >>> want
>> >>> to hear about actual applications that will keep us honest - what
>> >>> worked,
>> >>> what didn't work, where did it make sense to use ontologies and where
>> >>> was it
>> >>> a mistake?
>> >>>
>> >>> This first posting is to put the following questions on the table:
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Do you know of a good example of a large-scale domain application
>> >>> where
>> >>> someone could lead us through the ups and down of using ontological
>> >>> methods
>> >>> in its design or implementation?
>> >>> 2. Can you help us find the best speaker to participate in one of our
>> >>> two
>> >>> panel sessions (February 16th and March 8th)?
>> >>>
>> >>> So far, we have thoughts in the three domains mentioned above:
>> >>>
>> >>> Biomedical applications
>> >>> Smart grid architecture
>> >>> Government systems
>> >>>
>> >>> Please add to this list, and share your knowledge of systems and
>> >>> opinions
>> >>> about what has worked.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> - Steve Ray, Trish Whetzel
>> >>>
>> >>> Steven R. Ray, Ph.D.
>> >>> Distinguished Research Fellow
>> >>> Carnegie Mellon University
>> >>> NASA Research Park
>> >>> Building 23 (MS 23-11)
>> >>> P.O. Box 1
>> >>> Moffett Field, CA 94305-0001
>> >>> Email: steve.ray@xxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> Phone: (650) 587-3780
>> >>> Cell: (202) 316-6481
>> >>> Skype: steverayconsulting (08)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (09)
|