Re: [ontology-summit] [Applications] Launching the conversation about La

[Bob Smith <bobsmithttl@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks, Deb and Jack

 

 

Recapping:

 

Jack asks: What % of your need is satisfied by the BIM working group?

 

Deb believes about 30%...of need, and full scale smart cities (as the CETC-Sofi team is attempting to formalize) 5%

 

Would a Feb. conversation be helpful to consider how to think about "Benchmarking" these terms?

 

Regards,

 

Bob

On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Debmacp <debmacp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

For our industry needs about 30%, for full scale smart cities and the planet, less than 5%

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 21, 2012, at 1:09 AM, Jack Ring <jring7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Deb,
> What % of your need is satisfied by the BIM working group?
>
> On Jan 20, 2012, at 8:43 PM, Debmacp wrote:
>
>> The architecture/engineering/products domain is in desperate need of ontology to connect energy, healthcare, emergency management, financial, and actually nature - the non man made aspects in other discussions.
>>
>> We have solid classification systems and some ok vocabularies to offer, but the larger issue is the big system need for organization, consolidation, semantic discipline
>>
>> ...and something that really works in real world buildings like hospitals and research labs
>>
>> Deb MacPherson
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:49 PM, "Steve Ray (CMU)" <steve.ray@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Colleagues,
>>>  On behalf of the "Large-scale Domain Applications" track (Track 4)
>>> of the Ontology Summit we would like to share with you what this track is
>>> trying to bring out. As you may be aware, some of the other tracks and
>>> cross-track conversations will be talking about the practice of systems
>>> engineering, or quality issues, or about engineered systems in general. This
>>> track is designed to bring to the table some real-world examples from the
>>> perspective of any of a number of application domains. So, for example, one
>>> conversation might be about how large scale systems in the biomedical domain
>>> have used ontologies to meet their requirements. Or, we might be talking
>>> about how the smart grid "system" could be using ontology for better
>>> interoperability among utilities. Or, how U.S. government systems are using
>>> ontology to connect the dots among agencies. But most importantly, we want
>>> to hear about actual applications that will keep us honest - what worked,
>>> what didn't work, where did it make sense to use ontologies and where was it
>>> a mistake?
>>>
>>>  This first posting is to put the following questions on the table:
>>>
>>> 1. Do you know of a good example of a large-scale domain application where
>>> someone could lead us through the ups and down of using ontological methods
>>> in its design or implementation?
>>> 2. Can you help us find the best speaker to participate in one of our two
>>> panel sessions (February 16th and March 8th)?
>>>
>>> So far, we have thoughts in the three domains mentioned above:
>>>
>>> Biomedical applications
>>> Smart grid architecture
>>> Government systems
>>>
>>> Please add to this list, and share your knowledge of systems and opinions
>>> about what has worked.
>>>
>>>
>>> - Steve Ray, Trish Whetzel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Steven R. Ray, Ph.D.
>>> Distinguished Research Fellow
>>> Carnegie Mellon University
>>> NASA Research Park
>>> Building 23 (MS 23-11)
>>> P.O. Box 1
>>> Moffett Field, CA 94305-0001
>>> Email:    steve.ray@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> Phone: (650) 587-3780
>>> Cell:      (202) 316-6481
>>> Skype: steverayconsulting
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
>>> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
>>> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/
>>> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012
>>> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
>> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
>> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/
>> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012
>> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/

_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/

_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/   
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012  
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/     (01)