It's not clear to me why we would need to collect the terms or the artifacts in
each area (steps 2 and 3). That's a lot of work, and may not help in arriving at
#4, the categorization/typology framework. (01)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Peter Yim
> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 12:59 PM
> To: Ontology Summit 2007 Organizing Committee; Ontology
> Summit 2007 Forum
> Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] [ontology-summit-org] Proposed
> Process anddraft survey
> I've just posted a "Process Proposal-2" (draft) ... please review.
> (I like this one more than draft-1)
> Comments, suggestions, ... welcomed as always. We could
> discuss this at our call today (Thu 2007.02.15) which is
> starting in about 30 minutes.
> Regards. =ppy
> On 2/15/07, Peter P. Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Further to our discussion at the 2007.02.13 organizing committee
> > conference call, I promised to draft up a survey and
> circulate to the
> > committee for a quick review before bringing it up for
> discussion at
> > the 2006.02.15 Ontolog call.
> > Here it is ...
> > 1. I have started a Process page on the wiki - see:
> > http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007_Process
> > 2. I have documented my proposed process under:
> > ft1
> > Please review - Comments, suggestions, as well as other
> proposals are
> > welcomed.
> > 3. To augment that proposed process, I have included a draft survey
> > (and a prototype web form for it) as a strawman.
> > Again, please review - Comments, suggestions, as well as other
> > proposals are welcomed.
> > 4. Please post your input directly to the wiki if possible
> ... I will
> > also try to incorporate suggestions & comments received
> on/before Thu
> > 2007.02.15 12:00 noon EST into the wiki, before circulating the
> > proposal to the [ontology-summit] list, so that those who will be
> > attending the call can have a little bit of time to review
> it before
> > the conference call.
> > Regards. =ppy
> > P.S. I was hoping we can bring closure to the choice of the Summit
> > "tag line" so that we can announce it at the call tomorrow. So far,
> > we've only got input from Olivier, Barry and myself. The reason why
> > "folksonomy" word can get into the "tag line" is that I
> truly believe
> > that is more consistent with the spirit of "Ontology Summit
> 2007." ...
> > Don't respond to this issue here. I will prompt everyone again from
> > the proper e-mail thread.
> > Tx. =ppy
> > --
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Msg Archives: http://interop.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit-org/
> > Community Files:
> > Community Wiki:
> > http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007
> > To Post: mailto:ontology-summit-org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2007/
> Community Wiki:
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2007/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (03)