Sorry, left out the link to it. Here goes:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007_Process/Draft2 (01)
On 2/15/07, Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx> wrote: (02)
Re: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007_Process/Draft2
> I've just posted a "Process Proposal-2" (draft) ... please review.
> (I like this one more than draft-1)
>
> Comments, suggestions, ... welcomed as always. We could discuss this
> at our call today (Thu 2007.02.15) which is starting in about 30
> minutes.
>
> Regards. =ppy
> --
>
>
> On 2/15/07, Peter P. Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Further to our discussion at the 2007.02.13 organizing committee
> > conference call, I promised to draft up a survey and circulate to
> > the committee for a quick review before bringing it up for
> > discussion at the 2006.02.15 Ontolog call.
> >
> > Here it is ...
> >
> > 1. I have started a Process page on the wiki - see:
> > http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007_Process
> >
> > 2. I have documented my proposed process under:
> > http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007_Process/Draft1
> >
> >
> > Please review - Comments, suggestions, as well as other proposals
> > are welcomed.
> >
> > 3. To augment that proposed process, I have included a draft
> > survey (and a prototype web form for it) as a strawman.
> >
> > Again, please review - Comments, suggestions, as well as other
> > proposals are welcomed.
> >
> > 4. Please post your input directly to the wiki if possible ... I
> > will also try to incorporate suggestions & comments received
> > on/before Thu 2007.02.15 12:00 noon EST into the wiki, before
> > circulating the proposal to the [ontology-summit] list, so that
> > those who will be attending the call can have a little bit of
> > time to review it before the conference call.
> >
> > Regards. =ppy
> >
> > P.S. I was hoping we can bring closure to the choice of the
> > Summit "tag line" so that we can announce it at the call
> > tomorrow. So far, we've only got input from Olivier, Barry and
> > myself. The reason why "folksonomy" word can get into the "tag
> > line" is that I truly believe that is more consistent with the
> > spirit of "Ontology Summit 2007." ... Don't respond to this issue
> > here. I will prompt everyone again from the proper e-mail thread.
> > Tx. =ppy
> > --
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Msg Archives: http://interop.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit-org/
> > Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2007/
> > Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007
> > To Post: mailto:ontology-summit-org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> (03)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2007/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (04)
|