ontology-summit
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontology-summit] [ontology-summit-org] Proposed Process and draft s

To: "Ontology Summit 2007 Organizing Committee" <ontology-summit-org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Ontology Summit 2007 Forum" <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Peter Yim" <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:59:20 -0800
Message-id: <af8f58ac0702150959l1da9bc2ew1d958d811076c68@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I've just posted a "Process Proposal-2"  (draft) ... please review.
(I like this one more than draft-1)    (01)

Comments, suggestions, ... welcomed as always. We could discuss this
at our call  today (Thu 2007.02.15) which is starting in about 30
minutes.    (02)

Regards.  =ppy
--    (03)


On 2/15/07, Peter P. Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Further to our discussion at the 2007.02.13 organizing committee
> conference call, I promised to draft up a survey and circulate to
> the committee for a quick review before bringing it up for
> discussion at the 2006.02.15 Ontolog call.
>
> Here it is ...
>
> 1. I have started a Process page on the wiki - see:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007_Process
>
> 2. I have documented my proposed process under:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007_Process/Draft1
>
>
> Please review - Comments, suggestions, as well as other proposals
> are welcomed.
>
> 3. To augment that proposed process, I have included a draft
> survey (and a prototype web form for it) as a strawman.
>
> Again, please review - Comments, suggestions, as well as other
> proposals are welcomed.
>
> 4. Please post your input directly to the wiki if possible ... I
> will also try to incorporate suggestions & comments received
> on/before Thu 2007.02.15 12:00 noon EST into the wiki, before
> circulating the proposal to the [ontology-summit] list, so that
> those who will be attending the call can have a little bit of
> time to review it before the conference call.
>
> Regards.  =ppy
>
> P.S. I was hoping we can bring closure to the choice of the
> Summit "tag line" so that we can announce it at the call
> tomorrow. So far, we've only got input from Olivier, Barry and
> myself. The reason why "folksonomy" word can get into the "tag
> line" is that I truly believe that is more consistent with the
> spirit of "Ontology Summit 2007." ... Don't respond to this issue
> here. I will prompt everyone again from the proper e-mail thread.
>   Tx.  =ppy
> --
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Msg Archives: http://interop.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit-org/
> Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2007/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007
> To Post: mailto:ontology-summit-org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>    (04)

_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ 
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2007/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/    (05)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>