ontology-summit
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontology-summit] Defining "ontology"

To: Ontology Summit 2007 Forum <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:38:14 -0500
Message-id: <45B8C0D6.2070809@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Andreas,    (01)

That is indeed essential, and for any formal ontology
(i.e., one that is specified in some version of logic),
it should be satisfied:    (02)

 > 3. Ontologies are machine understandable.    (03)

But to avoid needless haggling over what it means for
a machine to "understand", we should use a neutral
word such as "processable".    (04)

Some versions of logic may be easier to process
than others, but that is a computational issue,
which is not essential to the definition.    (05)

John    (06)


_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ 
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2007/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/    (07)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>