ontology-summit
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontology-summit] Defining "ontology"

To: <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Ontology Summit 2007 Forum" <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Thomas J Beckman (E-mail)" <tombeckman@xxxxxxx>
From: "tom beckman" <tombeckman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:33:00 -0500
Message-id: <035901c73be7$7c8d07d0$0a00a8c0@bipper>
Dear Patrick,
 
From my AI world view, ontologies (as opposed to taxonomies) are fully described concepts with a primitive <concept attribute value> structure that can be further elaborated to describe:
  • relations between concepts/attributes,
  • the importance of an attribute, and
  • the certainty of a value 
with a structure something like <relation concept attribute value importance certainty>.  Facets can also be added to further describe differing <value> types.
 
I hope this helps.  Could you describe the characteristic structure and features of a "folksonomy" for me?  I'm not familiar with the term.
 
Best, Tom    301-920-0715
 
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Durusau" <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Ontology Summit 2007 Forum" <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 8:53 AM
Subject: [ontology-summit] Defining "ontology"

> Greetings,
>
> I am concerned with the suggestions that it is possible to create a
> continuum along which to organize what are known as "ontologies" in one
> or more circles.
>
> At least unless we are willing to concede that the creation of such a
> continuum is itself an imposition of assumptions from an undisclosed
> ontology.
>
> I am sure there are those who would say that folksonomies are "missing"
> features that are present in "formal" ontologies. Perhaps, but
> folksonomies predate "formal" ontologies by several millenia and have
> proven robust enough for many purposes. If the goal is to represent the
> opinions of the many rather than the few, perhaps it is "formal"
> ontologies that "missing" features.
>
> I am not taking a position one way or the other. But, I do think it is
> important to realize that any attempt to construct a continuum is with
> an unstated choice of a winner before the the continuum is populated.
>
> Hope everyone is looking forward to a great weekend!
>
> Patrick
>
> --
> Patrick Durusau
>
Patrick@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface
> Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model
> Member, Text Encoding Initiative Board of Directors, 2003-2005
>
> Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work!
>
>

> _________________________________________________________________
> Msg Archives:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
> Subscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ 
> Unsubscribe:
mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2007/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
>

_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ 
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2007/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/    (01)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>