To: | <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Ontology Summit 2007 Forum" <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Cc: | "Thomas J Beckman (E-mail)" <tombeckman@xxxxxxx> |
From: | "tom beckman" <tombeckman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:33:00 -0500 |
Message-id: | <035901c73be7$7c8d07d0$0a00a8c0@bipper> |
Dear Patrick,
From my AI world view, ontologies (as opposed
to taxonomies) are fully described concepts with a primitive <concept
attribute value> structure that can be further elaborated to
describe:
with a structure something like <relation
concept attribute value importance certainty>. Facets can also be added
to further describe differing <value> types.
I hope this helps. Could you describe the
characteristic structure and features of a "folksonomy" for me? I'm not
familiar with the term.
Best, Tom
301-920-0715
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Durusau" <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Ontology Summit 2007 Forum" <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 8:53 AM
Subject: [ontology-summit] Defining
"ontology" > > I am concerned with the suggestions that it is possible to create a > continuum along which to organize what are known as "ontologies" in one > or more circles. > > At least unless we are willing to concede that the creation of such a > continuum is itself an imposition of assumptions from an undisclosed > ontology. > > I am sure there are those who would say that folksonomies are "missing" > features that are present in "formal" ontologies. Perhaps, but > folksonomies predate "formal" ontologies by several millenia and have > proven robust enough for many purposes. If the goal is to represent the > opinions of the many rather than the few, perhaps it is "formal" > ontologies that "missing" features. > > I am not taking a position one way or the other. But, I do think it is > important to realize that any attempt to construct a continuum is with > an unstated choice of a winner before the the continuum is populated. > > Hope everyone is looking forward to a great weekend! > > Patrick > > -- > Patrick Durusau > Patrick@xxxxxxxxxxx > Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface > Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model > Member, Text Encoding Initiative Board of Directors, 2003-2005 > > Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work! > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ > Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ > Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2007/ > Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007 > Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ > _________________________________________________________________ Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2007/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007 Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (01) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontology-summit] Defining "ontology", Obrst, Leo J. |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontology-summit] categorizing "ontology", tom beckman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontology-summit] Lattice and context, John F. Sowa |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontology-summit] Defining "ontology", Patrick Durusau |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |