To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Thomas Johnston <tmj44p@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 2 May 2015 16:17:05 +0000 (UTC) |
Message-id: | <941688772.280247.1430583425764.JavaMail.yahoo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
John, The classical definition of a statement, as I understand it, is that it is a declarative sentence with all indexicals resolved. So, as a statement, a fluent is a statement schema such that resolving its temporal indexical produces a statement. (If we move on to propositions, we get into some deep issues, such as whether or not any propositions can change their truth values over time.) In other words, a fluent is a family of statements all identical except for the point or period of time associated with them. Sounds like an interesting concept. More generally, we can conceive of a statement-family as a statement schema in which one or more indexicals are not resolved -- place, time, person, perhaps even propositional attitude. Are such statement families worth reifying? Or is it enough simply to understand that many apparent statements are not statements because of indexicality? Tom On Saturday, May 2, 2015 10:11 AM, John F Sowa <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Rich and Tom, RC > I think you are describing what is best represented as fluents in the > table. A "fluent" row comprises the predicate's specified value of > true or false, and its parametric bindings to objects and properties. TJ > Which suggests that I must currently fail to understand what you mean > by "fluents". Can you enlighten me? The term 'fluent' was introduced by John McCarthy and Pat Hayes in the classic paper "Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of AI": JMC & PJH (1969) http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/mcchay69.pdf > A fluent is a function whose domain is the space Sit of situations. For example, the sentence "It is raining" is a _propositional fluent_. For any situation in which it is raining, that fluent has value true. Another fluent is the phrase 'the president', which depends on the organization and the time. For the situation of the USA at this moment, the value of that fluent is a human named Barack Obama. The term 'fluent' is a useful generic for many terms that have the modifier 'context dependent'. For related documents, search for the word 'context' in http://www.jfsowa.com/ikl/ . John _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Watchout Watson: Here comes Amazon Machine Learning - ZDNet-2015.04.10, John F Sowa |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Watchout Watson: Here comes Amazon Machine Learning - ZDNet-2015.04.10, Rich Cooper |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Watchout Watson: Here comes Amazon Machine Learning - ZDNet-2015.04.10, John F Sowa |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Watchout Watson: Here comes Amazon Machine Learning - ZDNet-2015.04.10, Rich Cooper |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |