|From:||Ravi Sharma <drravisharma@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Wed, 18 Mar 2015 01:34:57 -0700|
How difficult is it to consider every object as being part of special relativity at least, therefore time variations affect the object's 3D aspects or location, etc. (I do not know enough of Special relativity to go to multidimensional space-time tensors)?
Thus both thing and time get connected and we can also describe processes inherent (motion - orbit of a particle) or associated with thing (manufacturing on a production line each position of product varies with time and place on the line (object or thing evolves).
Inherent Versus External aspects of things as these relate to time, is that the question here?
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Rich Cooper <Rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
(Dr. Ravi Sharma)
313 204 1740 Mobile
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Endurantism and Perdurantism - Re: Some Comments on Descriptive vs. Prescriptive Ontologies, Matthew West|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Endurantism and Perdurantism, Matthew West|
|Previous by Thread:|
|Next by Thread:|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|