On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Jack Park <jackpark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Patrick Cassidy <pat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Concerning a Wiki for ontology and ontolog: re Matthew West’s comment:
>>
>>
>>
>> [MW] > One of the possibilities is that this becomes the topic for the
>> Ontology Summit. I am thinking that we might develop a framework of topics
>> that we might then go on to fill in pieces over time
>>
>> One thing I am certain of is that it will only have value if it is
>> organized and managed. I have seen several attempts at self organization,
>> and not yet seen something that works. So we will need gardeners and
>> librarians or it will decay with remarkable rapidity.
>>
>>
>>
>> I like this idea. It is worth a whole summit to discuss.
>>
>>
>>
>> Pat
>>
>>
>
> Agree!
>
2¢:
If you want a dynamic conversation - run two jabberbots at each other,
but off the same wiki and build a structure of call & response.
To a new person, the dialog would be dynamic and informative*, to an
experienced observer the paths of the bots would become richer as the
wiki is built out. User feedback could be used to highlight areas of
the wiki that need input/fixing. Maybe use CCO[1] to keep track of who
knows what. [1]
http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/details/vocabulary_cco.html
*well, the potential exists... (01)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (02)
|