To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | David Whitten <whitten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 20 Jun 2014 18:46:41 -0400 |
Message-id: | <CAH8N84xM1jMbzw8ZQhrVSxRYkt+XCP0-Gvo8BGK3y0Xvzj7mqg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Lest there be anyone who sees Rich's replies below, thinking that he is describing
how the currently working HIS software used by the VA (named VistA) works, I am going to clarify below.
Again as to Ontolog Forum discussions, I think we need to find some way to match two different expressions of software, each of which might be described by an individual ontology, and both of which are described with a common (third) ontology,
and find ways to solve the mis-match impedance between the two expressions/formulations. On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Rich Cooper <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And as John Sowa says, there are small communities of speech which have very precise meanings for words which may not be well covered by a general definition. This is happening with the word "dispense" as it is used by a pharmacist.
The VistA software uses the word phrase "fill a prescription" to mean that drugs are given to someone based on an order or prescription. In Inpatient pharmacy, "filling a prescription" is broken up into two sub-actions, "dispensing a prescription" and "administering a prescription". The phrase "dispense a prescription" means that the drugs have left the control of the pharmacy, usually by being placed in a location near the patient, which is still heavily controlled. The phrase "administer a prescription" means that a nurse or other clinician removes the medicine from the dispense location/cabinet and brings it to a patient who, hopefully, takes the medicine. Since patients might spit up the medicine, refuse to take it by dropping it on the floor, etc, a computer system can't bill based on the successful administration of medicine. Usually the billing starts when the medicine has been dispensed to the nurse. A few times, the billing is reversed if the medicine is refused but not "wasted", and a few times a particular patient may get a bill for more dispensed meds than actually was taken, usually for these reasons.
This method of nurses keeping the bulk containers is not common in the VA, and some other hospitals. In these medical treatment facilities, the more common method is "unit dose" packaging where a patient gets the actual pills/doses needed in separate packaging, usually with a bar code stamped on it to aid in tracking the administration of the medicine. These individualized packaged medicines are usually stored in a med cart or closet in a drawer specifically labeled for that patient. The process of "med cart filling" occurs regularly (usually once or more a day) to replenish the unit dose packed medicines before they need to be administered.
My experience has been that this is a joint effort between multiple departments of the hospitals. Rarely do nurses carry the full load of drug handling from the loading/shipping dock through the placement in the local medical cart/closet.
This might be a design that works for some hospitals, but VistA certainly does not have internal websites controlled solely by the nurses.
By the way for those who don't know the acronyms, NIC is Nurse in Charge, and and DON is Director of Nursing. Rich is also simplifying to a degree, there is a lot of work making sure these metrics work well for all the different levels from a nurse who deals primarily with patients up through a nurse who deals mostly with organization issues.
These are the issues that people fight about for years. What is simple to a computer analyst is not simple for other folks. It is also true that web-design approaches clash with existing centralized database approaches, with everyone advocating the approach that they are most comfortable with.
Grin. I don't think anything is easy to justify (even though all those people have interactive access within VistA) but it is fun to imagine such a sweeping change happening within only three years.
It's been my experience that any well specified format (in XML or not) there are times when it is not specified enough, and times when it is constrictively specified. And depending on the person using the format, and what they are trying to accomplish, sometimes the same format is both. Some people have problems being consistent in their observations, even when seeing the same patient within the same week.
Yes, but as I mentioned earlier, using BCMA (Bar Code Medicine Administration) has impact in non-obvious ways, such as the unit dose packaging.
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01) |
Previous by Date: | [ontolog-forum] Patent Vocabulary Ontology and Corpus, Rich Cooper |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Requesting Opinions on the Benefits of Predicates as Nodes, Rich Cooper |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Requesting Opinions on the Benefits of Predicates as Nodes, Kingsley Idehen |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Requesting Opinions on the Benefits of Predicates as Nodes, Rich Cooper |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |