ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Visual Notation for OWL Ontologies (VOWL)

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Simon Spero <sesuncedu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 21:13:04 -0400
Message-id: <CADE8KM6juRbZHwAhu90G-Q3rYaUF0+MM-A0tbwFp0Jr4URXCug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[For simplicity, assume no abnormal squid]

In Cyc you can say:

(implies  (isa ?S Squid) 
   (thereExistExactly 10 ?T 
   (and (isa ?T Tentacle) (anatomicalParts ?S ?T))))

In OWL you can write:
 SubClassOf(:Squid 
  ObjectExactCardinality(10 
                     :anatomicalParts :Tentacle))

Could you show what this looks like graphical form?

Simon
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 6:53 PM, John F Sowa <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 5/12/2014 12:13 PM, Piotr Nowara wrote:
> I believe you will find this effort interesting, at the very least :-)

Yes.  I agree that it's interesting.  It shows something profound
about the OWL mentality -- and not in a favorable sense.

First, I recommend an intro to Peirce's existential graphs (EGs):

    http://www.jfsowa.com/talks/egintro.pdf

The first 10 slides are a self-contained intro to FOL plus metalanguage.
The remaining slides get into advanced topics in language and logic.
Then compare that to the intro to VOWL notation in

    http://vowl.visualdataweb.org/v2/

By contrast, this hugely complex document admits that "Familiarity with
OWL and other Semantic Web technologies is required to understand this
specification."

John


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>