On 5/12/2014 12:13 PM, Piotr Nowara wrote:
> I believe you will find this effort interesting, at the very least :-) (01)
Yes. I agree that it's interesting. It shows something profound
about the OWL mentality -- and not in a favorable sense. (02)
First, I recommend an intro to Peirce's existential graphs (EGs): (03)
The first 10 slides are a self-contained intro to FOL plus metalanguage.
The remaining slides get into advanced topics in language and logic.
Then compare that to the intro to VOWL notation in (05)
By contrast, this hugely complex document admits that "Familiarity with
OWL and other Semantic Web technologies is required to understand this
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (09)