On 5/12/2014 12:13 PM, Piotr Nowara wrote:
> I believe you will find this effort interesting, at the very least :-) (01)
Yes. I agree that it's interesting. It shows something profound
about the OWL mentality -- and not in a favorable sense. (02)
First, I recommend an intro to Peirce's existential graphs (EGs): (03)
http://www.jfsowa.com/talks/egintro.pdf (04)
The first 10 slides are a self-contained intro to FOL plus metalanguage.
The remaining slides get into advanced topics in language and logic.
Then compare that to the intro to VOWL notation in (05)
http://vowl.visualdataweb.org/v2/ (06)
By contrast, this hugely complex document admits that "Familiarity with
OWL and other Semantic Web technologies is required to understand this
specification." (07)
John (08)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (09)
|