To: | mclange@xxxxxxxxxxx, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Juan de Nadie <juandenavas@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 3 Jan 2013 23:07:39 -0200 |
Message-id: | <CAFZD8G6B85j3tOaWqz-aO5bWUS8g6Rk3C93fvAaFP5wyj=8mbQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
And, particularly, I think that in this specific situation the author (Guarino) tried to fit both requirements. He provide several examples that help in undersatanding the presented notions. I have previously understood the intuitive notions underlying the exposition.
My troubles were related only to the mathematical formalization. And this occurred because I wanted to go into details (I hate to be defeated by math). But, with the aditional references to the notions of powerset and "n-th Cartesian power of a set", the formalization became clear.
I would like to thank all participants. Best regards. 2013/1/3 matthew lange <mclange@xxxxxxxxxxx> Why does it have to be _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Intensional relation, William Frank |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Intensional relation, Juan de Nadie |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Intensional relation, matthew lange |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Intensional relation, sowa |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |