|From:||William Frank <williamf.frank@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Wed, 28 Nov 2012 13:20:15 -0500|
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Amanda Vizedom <amanda.vizedom@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, I understand now the problem of people thinking a name OR label has to accurately express the meaning they want the concept to have. An effective way of creating this shared perception is needed.
Sure, as in
To me, this is the best summary of the problem and the solution.
I would like to see a set of guidelines to effect this kind of solution. I have tried to do so by assiduosly insisting on highly structured, fullsome, entirely English definitions of domain concepts, as a preparatory step to constructing an ontology in a formal language.
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] doing standards [was - Re: Webby objects], Sergei Nirenburg|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] doing standards [was - Re: Webby objects], Godfrey Rust|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] doing standards [was - Re: Webby objects], Amanda Vizedom|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] doing standards [was - Re: Webby objects], Godfrey Rust|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|