Sorry: Borges.
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Obrst, Leo J.
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 4:48 PM
To: [ontolog-forum]
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] [ontology-summit] Estimating number of all known facts
Pat, have you ever read any Stanislaw Lem (or maybe Boges)? You’ll find a compatriot. My favorite is Imaginary Magnitude.
Thanks,
Leo
Perhaps it’s a high-school research project?
For amusement (hopefully):
http://www.micra.com/speculations/IntelligentDesign.doc
Pat
Patrick Cassidy
MICRA Inc.
cassidy@xxxxxxxxx
908-561-3416
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Pat Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> This question makes me wonder what other thing, **besides** a fact, you might propose to be knowing?
My wife and I are pretty well acquainted with one another. Hence, I can truthfully say, I know Jackie.
But you could be just a brain in some kind of Capital Gains Tax. Wait - that doesn't sound right.
Personally I think we're all just computer simulated agents in a long running pan-dimensional university research project. I explains so many things; quanta are the result of fixed precision floating point - hence
also those weird quantum effects; they're just rounding errors. Gravity and Quantum mechanics don't fit well together? Implemented by different postdocs. Myths of paradisiacal rewards and eternal life; clear parallel with the myth of tenure-track positions.
And I think we all see where our myths of this all-powerful bearded figure come from.
I call this hypothesis Gradical Skepticism.