To: | edbark@xxxxxxxx, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Cc: | "[ontolog-summit]" <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
From: | Simon Spero <sesuncedu@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 24 May 2012 16:52:30 -0400 |
Message-id: | <CADE8KM6BbtOPVpOaQG4Z2MYKHQv8KYi78rdS+KrZZ7Qw0tPTdQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Ed Barkmeyer <edbark@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
The power set of reals is uncountable; if it counts as known fact that something is a member of that set then the number of known facts we can derive is uncountable.
One possible approach to making a WAG would be to take a random sample of entries from an encyclopedia and convert them to a logical form. Only add new entries to your fact base if they aren't already implied by facts from other entries. Make a guess at a forumula for estimating the number of new facts for entry n+1, find the integral then use it to guess how many facts are in all entries. It's not always algorithmically possible to tell if a fact is implied by existing facts, but since this is a WAG, you can just put a time or depth limit. Simon _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Estimating number of all known facts, doug foxvog |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] [ontology-summit] Estimating number of all known facts, doug foxvog |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] [ontology-summit] Estimating number of all known facts, Ed Barkmeyer |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] [ontology-summit] Estimating number of all known facts, doug foxvog |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |