On Sun, February 27, 2011 11:44, ZENG, MARCIA said:
> I happen to find the taxonomy behind wik.me, starting from the high level:
>
> * organization
> * person
> * production
> * location
> * event (01)
Very general concepts included in wik.me are not subclasses of anything
in this list. A top-level concept that SHOULD include all of these is
"Entity", defined as "That which is perceived or known or inferred to
have its own distinct existence (living or nonliving)." I suppose
things like "corner" would not be entities, since they have no
independent existence. (02)
I don't see that wik.me has a taxonomy. It has concepts, which are
specified as "of" one or two other concepts. This "of" can sometimes
mean a subclass relation, sometimes mean an instance of relation, and
other times have other meanings. (03)
For example, the "Corner" which is defined as "an interior angle
formed by two meeting walls" is "of" both "building" and "area". (04)
The listed set leaves things such as organisms out. One would think
that they all should be subclass of "Entity". If you follow some type
of animal up the hierarchy, you find at many levels it is "of" both
the next more general taxon AND "of" the current taxon type. E.g.,
the concept "Chordata" is "of" both "phylum" and "Animalia". However,
"Animalia" is only "of" "kingdom", it is not "of" "Organism". The
concept "animal" is "of" both "Animalia" and "Organism", but no chain
of "of"s links concepts for most types of animals to the concept "animal". (05)
Wik.me provides some interesting results, but it is no taxonomy. (06)
-- doug foxvog (07)
> http://wik.me/1#foundPages (08)
> At each 'category' there is also a synonym ring, for example, e.g.:
>
> Person
>
> Of people, organism and causal agent May also be referred to as
> individual, mortal, somebody, someone and soul.
>
> A human being; "there was too much for one person to do".
>
> It would be interesting to see the taxonomy, for example, 'shape' is the
> first under 'people'.
> Thanks for sharing this interesting service!
> Marcia
>
> On 2/27/11 4:12 AM, "Stephen Young" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Pavithra, I think you must have misspelled "Einstein".
> http://search.wik.me/search.htm?words=Albert+Einstein returns 20+
> concepts named for Albert Einstein - and the topmost result is the man
> himself. And that list is something you CANNOT get from Google.
>
> Clicking the top result http://wik.me/lfn2 ("Albert Einstein") also gives
> you something you can't get from Google - a self-organised presentation of
> what wik.me <http://wik.me> "knows" about Einstein. Google knows
> *nothing* about Einstein but where to find pages that contain the string
> "Albert Einstein".
>
> Structured data is always going to permit greater functionality than
> keyword indexing. If it didn't, you and I wouldn't have a job ;-)
>
> But of course Google is more robust - it would have detected your spelling
> mistake and given you the most-likely valid alternative. So it should be
> with 2000 engineers and over a decade of refinement.
>
> wik.me <http://wik.me> can also only return results based on the data it
> has mapped, which means it's a valid alternative to Google for only a
> minority of searches. Our estimates suggest that with all organisations,
> products and services in, we should give a much better experience for
> around 65% of all searches currently made against Google. That's next.
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> On 26 February 2011 23:07, Pavithra <pavithra_kenjige@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> wik.me <http://wik.me/> is another search tool with a LIST of results ..
> does not provide anything more than Google would. Google is more robust .
> This uses information from answers.com <http://answers.com> etc..
> The word "Albert Einstein" did not get a result at all, but a list of
> names that started with Albert and did not include Einstein.
>
> Qwiki.com actually provides information on what is typed in. When it can
> not find the actual information ( NOT A LIST) it simply says it did not
> find it. For example, if you type world's tallest building, it did not
> find any information. They need to include lot more data sets..
>
> Quiki.com seems to be more in the direction of web 3.0 mobile apps with
> plenty of room to grow. But the audio is very mechanical, unlike
> Watson;s voice. ( :-) )!
>
> Pavithra
>
> --- On Fri, 2/25/11, Stephen Young <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Stephen Young <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] the data mining craze
> To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Friday, February 25, 2011, 6:28 PM
>
>
> We actually characterised qwiki as the reverse wik.me <http://wik.me>
> when we first saw it ;-) All style no substance. There may have been
> some bitterness ;-) - we both applied to launch at TechCrunch Disrupt last
> year. They got in, we didn't.
>
> I'm frequently amazed by what captures (and fails to capture) the
> imagination of the technology pundit. We presented a site/app that is a
> quantum improvement over Web 2.0 structured data plays like Freebase and
> Factual. Among other things our video demonstrated that anyone could
> change complex structured data with simple twitter-like comments - and yet
> we didn't make the cut. Qwiki went on to win the Techrunch Disrupt prize
> - followed soon after by some serious venture funding.
>
> Mind you, this forum is little different. I've just announced the
> ontological equivalent of a flying car here and received no more interest
> than a few private messages ;-)
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (09)
=============================================================
doug foxvog doug@xxxxxxxxxx http://ProgressiveAustin.org (010)
"I speak as an American to the leaders of my own nation. The great
initiative in this war is ours. The initiative to stop it must be ours."
- Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
============================================================= (011)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (012)
|