On 2/25/2011 6:28 PM, Stephen Young wrote:
> We actually characterised qwiki as the reverse wik.me <http://wik.me>
> when we first saw it ;-) All style no substance. (01)
I tried wik.me, and I found it much more useful than qwiki.
It's fun to try out qwiki once. But I don't have the
slightest interest in using it for anything. (02)
But I like the way wik.me provides a short paragraph
for the most likely hit and a good selection of other hits. (03)
When wik.me can't find a good hit, it provides a much larger
selection of one-line possibilities on the first page than
Google does. That's very useful. (04)
> I'm frequently amazed by what captures (and fails to capture)
> the imagination of the technology pundit. (05)
I'm not surprised at all. (06)
John (07)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (08)
|