[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] 3D+1 (was presentism...was blah blah blah)

To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Wacek Kusnierczyk <waku@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:54:01 -0600
Message-id: <4D4C2F29.8060301@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On 2/4/11 10:19 AM, Yu Lin wrote:
> Sorry.
> To correct:
>   it seems that you denied that c1 as an instance has timestamp. But
> not "it seems that you denied that c1 as an instance has no
> timestamp."    (01)

Can you point me to where I deny c1 as an instance has a timestamp?    (02)

What I said was that I don't know what the timestamp you mention would be:    (03)

>>> In BFO, I think, what is born is qualities.  You're likely not suggesting
>>> there are temporal stamp qualities born by continuants, right?  However, I'm
>>> not sure what you mean, precisely, with 'bears a temporal stamp'.    (04)

vQ    (05)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (06)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>