On 2/4/11 10:19 AM, Yu Lin wrote:
> Sorry.
> To correct:
> it seems that you denied that c1 as an instance has timestamp. But
> not "it seems that you denied that c1 as an instance has no
> timestamp." (01)
Can you point me to where I deny c1 as an instance has a timestamp? (02)
What I said was that I don't know what the timestamp you mention would be: (03)
>>> In BFO, I think, what is born is qualities. You're likely not suggesting
>>> there are temporal stamp qualities born by continuants, right? However, I'm
>>> not sure what you mean, precisely, with 'bears a temporal stamp'. (04)
vQ (05)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (06)
|