[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] using SKOS for controlled values for controlled voca

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Phil Murray <pcmurray2000@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:40:06 -0400
Message-id: <4CB4E3C6.6000606@xxxxxxxxx>
Pavithra wrote:
>>  LO: I don't think that NL *is* logic, or ontology *is* logic. I think that
>> logic and mathematics, >i.e., formalization, is one of our best tools
>> for advancing understanding about phenomena >of the world.    (01)

> I think that is the best observation that I read today in this forum.    (02)

I disagree. Your question,    (03)

> Isn't grammar the logic of the language? The verbs and the nouns and
> what should follow what?? )    (04)

... is even better. Simple, but very important and often ignored.    (05)

> Please continue, this has been an interesting reading..    (06)

I agree wholeheartedly.    (07)

Phil Murray    (08)

---------------------    (09)

The Semantic Advantage
Turning Information into Assets
401-247-7899    (010)

Blog: http://semanticadvantage.wordpress.com
Web site: http://www.semanticadvantage.com    (011)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (012)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>