ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Triadic Sign Relations

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "AzamatAbdoullaev" <abdoul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:36:10 +0300
Message-id: <CC02618D897341BEA9E32FA6C4834718@personalpc>

RC wrote: "So a familiar sign S represents another sign S2 in one agent?s mind, yet can represent only S itself in another agent?s mind, while simultaneously representing S3 (money, a document ?) to still another agent?"

ASHA: A sign points out to something else, while a symbol takes place and stands for something else. The nature of meaning relationship (or signification) lies in the sorts of things acting as signs (or symbols) and the sorts of things to be referred (signified).

The power of words, used by human minds, is in the double capacity to point out and stand for another things. Again, there are verbal symbols and nonverbal symbols, as vocal signs and nonvocal signs. Among the nonverbal symbols are money, ceremonies, seals, titles, etc. 

 RC: "Another interesting aspect of your answer is that you use the word ?thing? as the most general of all thingish words like object, plurality, stuff, material ?; is that your mental image of the word ?thing?, as the most abstract of all objects?

ASHA: Yes, Thing refers to the Universal Class of all sorts of entities, implying the universal property of all entities, whereas Nothing refers to the Null Class .

RC: Can a ?thing? include an action, method, plan, history of the foregoing?"

ASHA: In the broad sense, it is a substance, state, change, process as far as " every sign is also a thing, for what is not a thing is nothing at all".

In NL, words are the signs of ideas and images, thoughts and feelings, while the mental signs are the similitudes of things.

The beauty of machines consists in that they don't require the mental signs (ideas and images) as the medium whereby symbols (physical signals) could signify the real things.

 

Azamat Abdoullaev 

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 12:20 AM
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Triadic Sign Relations

Hi Azamat,

 

You wrote:

 

"That confuses me no end if Peirceans can?t tie the theory to some commonly understood reality for me.  Is there a more fruitful description that explains the language used and chosen for that representation?"

Rich,

The nature of signs and symbols and significations, their definition, elements, and types, was mainly established by Aristotle, Augustine, and Aquinas.

According to these classic sources, significance is a relationship between two sorts of things: signs and the kinds of things they signify (intend, express or mean), where one term necessarily causes something else to come to the mind. Distinguishing natural signs and conventional signs, the traditional theory of signs sets the following threefold partition of things:

  1. There are things that are just things, not any sign at all;
  2. There are things that are also signs of other things (as natural signs of the physical world and mental signs of the mind);
  3. There are things that are always signs, as languages (natural and artificial) and other cultural nonverbal symbols, as documents, money, ceremonies, and rites. see a brief but comprehensive account, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign

Azamat Abdoullaev

 

Thanks for your view on this; it helps me compare and contrast my own theoretical understanding with yours.  

 

So a familiar sign S represents another sign S2 in one agent?s mind, yet can represent only S itself in another agent?s mind, while simultaneously representing S3 (money, a document ?) to still another agent?

 

Another interesting aspect of your answer is that you use the word ?thing? as the most general of all thingish words like object, plurality, stuff, material ?; is that your mental image of the word ?thing?, as the most abstract of all objects?

 

Can a ?thing? include an action, method, plan, history of the foregoing?

 

Thanks for the stimulating viewpoint,

-Rich

 

Sincerely,

Rich Cooper

EnglishLogicKernel.com

Rich AT EnglishLogicKernel DOT com

9 4 9 \ 5 2 5 - 5 7 1 2

 

 

 

 



_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>