ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Software as art, metrics, etc. (was: MVC)

To: <edbark@xxxxxxxx>, "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "AzamatAbdoullaev" <abdoul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:14:39 +0200
Message-id: <E939785EADDB45589BC401F5B33F9DE8@personalpc>
P.S. Is that short enough for Azamat?
Ed, your communication brings a pleasure to read, however short or long it 
might be :-).
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ed Barkmeyer" <edbark@xxxxxxxx>
To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Software as art, metrics, etc. (was: MVC)    (01)


>
> David Eddy wrote:
>> Duane -
>>
>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Duane Nickull wrote:
>>
>> It comes down to the fact that code is art.
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>> I cringe whenever I hear "software engineer" particularly when
>> someone delivers it with a straight face.
>>
>>
>
> I lost Jeffrey Schiffel's email, but I support his position.  I hope
> this is a troll.
> I cringe whenever I meet a programmer who thinks he is an artist.
>
> A program is a machine.  People rely on it to do some part of their
> business.
> Do you want to fly across the country on an aircraft built by an artist?
> Do you want the ABS in your car to be an artwork?
> Do you want the life support system in the ICU to be art?
>
> The reason why we trust engineers to make ABS's and aircraft is that
> they have a discipline that gives the company the willingness to provide
> a warranty and accept legal liability.  As long as programmers think
> they are artists, you will get the Microsoft form of warranty -- caveat
> emptor.
>
> The "artist" view of software engineering should have vanished in 1980.
> The software in automobiles and aircraft, manufacturing controllers,
> train controllers and life support systems has been engineered since
> 1975, and the software in network servers has been engineered since
> 1990.  But for some reason, many people still trust their business to
> artworks, and pay annual fees for repainting/resculpting them.  This
> nonsense has got to stop.
>
> -Ed
>
> P.S. Is that short enough for Azamat?
>
> -- 
> Edward J. Barkmeyer                        Email: edbark@xxxxxxxx
> National Institute of Standards & Technology
> Manufacturing Systems Integration Division
> 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8263                Tel: +1 301-975-3528
> Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8263                FAX: +1 301-975-4694
>
> "The opinions expressed above do not reflect consensus of NIST,
> and have not been reviewed by any Government authority."
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     (02)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (03)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>