To: | "John F. Sowa" <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Cc: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
From: | Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:07:25 +0000 |
Message-id: | <4a4804720912101207o724b4144o814d530caad1e59@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
John to sum up some of the discussions we have had over this which have been lingering at the back of my head 1. from empirical observation based on my direct experience in different countries, I conjectured in various threads (posts dating back to 2007) that it looks to me that some people in some cultures think differently, pointing to this rather vague argument called 'there must be a chinese logic' 2. you and others argued that all logical systems are based on FOL (if I remember correctly) and that logical reasoning is not different between east and west I have managed to do some reading on the subject (got on a train ride at last) the book I pointed in another thread you commented on > http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zVOWoXDunp8C&dq=complex+systems+logic&source=gbs_navlinks_s : _Chaotic Logic: Language, Thought, and Reality from the Perspective of Complex Systems Science_. In this book, Ben Goertzel contains lots of precious stuff for me In particular, I think I have found some justification for my argument above on pages 94/96 and 97 in what is referred to as mould theories Sapir-Whorf being one of these kinds http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/short/whorf.html Mould theories represent language as 'a mould in terms of which thought categories are cast' (Bruner et al. 1956, p. 11 ie: Language guides our categorization of the world (Lot more in that book that is relevant to the discussions on semantics, meaning and the lot that we are having on this list but maybe more comments later) comment welcome cheers PDM - Paola Di Maio ************************************************** “Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.” Albert Einstein ************************************************** *************************************************** _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Form and content, Rich Cooper |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] the justfication for chinese logic/mould theories, ravi sharma |
Previous by Thread: | [ontolog-forum] Form and content, John F. Sowa |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] the justfication for chinese logic/mould theories, ravi sharma |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |