To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:27:28 +0000 |
Message-id: | <4a4804720911270227x341312e5h867bdf4ed173faee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
John
what I noticed is that much of the thinking (setting aside the ideology point) is done by computer scientists while in my view sw challenges are not striclty CS per se Information Management dont particularly count as scientist either, On top of that 'social 'science is not taken into account a bit like having a team of only civil engineers, and no architects/ planners while its' true that infrastructure is really really important, we would not want our cities to be run and governed solely by plumbers and electricians If anybody whispers that JSON might be better do you have evidence to that effect? But just compare two groups that both started at Stanford around the same time: Agreed that comparing google with protege to measure success of the latter does not seem fair its a different ball game, isnt it ?:-) PDM _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontology development method, marc.l.walker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontology development method, Doug McDavid |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontology development method, John F. Sowa |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontology development method, Doug McDavid |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |