Re: [ontolog-forum] Offline note

[Ron Wheeler <rwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

John F. Sowa wrote:
> Frank,
>
> On that point I completely agree:
>
>  > ontology itself is far from being a science, you may want
>  > to remember.
>
> That is why I believe that it is premature to choose one ontology
> that is canonized as an official standard.  My recommendation has
> always been that we should develop a systematic classification
> (a lattice or at least a partial ordering) of all ontologies that
> meet minimal criteria for coherence.
>
> Then the choice between them should be determined by the
> marketplace:  the users can choose which one(s) are most
> appropriate for their problems.
>
>   
+1  That would be a bit help to the universe.
> Re judgmentalism:  Proponents of Marxism, Freudianism, and
> Objectivism are among the most judgmental people on earth.
>
> John
>
>  
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  
>
>       (01)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (02)