ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Last Call: OWL 2 and rdf:text primitive datatype

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@xxxxxx>, public-owl-comments@xxxxxx
From: Pavithra <pavithra_kenjige@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <667793.49754.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acceptance of words and meanings, is a learned by usage!   I believe the term "Class" was derived by "classification" to represent abstract data types.   To me it makes perfect sense.   Even though the implementation / usage varies  according the specific programming language.
 
In Anglo Saxon vocabulary  the term "issue" means "a child / children"  and it is used heavily in Wikipedia.  If you look up a person in Wikipedia, you can see that at the personal profile.  [ To me,   it is confusing! How can a child be a issue?  A child is child.  ]
 
Just an objective observation!
 
Pavithra Kenjige
 


--- On Sun, 4/26/09, Richard H. McCullough <rhm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Last Call: OWL 2 and rdf:text primitive datatype
To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@xxxxxx>, public-owl-comments@xxxxxx
Date: Sunday, April 26, 2009, 4:34 PM

----- Original Message -----
From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx.
>
> In current terminology, we have three terms 'set', 'class', and 'type'.
> The words 'set' and 'type' have long histories in both technical and
> informal usage, and there is no confusion about their meanings.
>
> The word 'class' has been used in so many conflicting ways in both
> technical and informal usage that it causes a great deal of confusion.
>
> Therefore, my recommendation is to prefer the words 'set' and 'type'
> for all metalevel usage, both technical and informal.  The word
> 'class' could still be used for particular languages in which it
> is endemic.  But to promote precision, the words 'set' and 'type'
> should be preferred for all cross-language discussions.
>
> John Sowa
>
Don't forget the word 'concept', as used in natural language.
The Rand ITOE 1990 book is a good reference for concept-related
terminology.  Rand terminology is based on Aristotle.
My tabula rasa terminology is based on Rand.

> Dick McCullough
http://mkrmke.org



_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>