To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx |
Date: | Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:36:49 +0100 |
Message-id: | <c09b00eb0904250536q616158e0q9b647e76c940cc6b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Following an idea of Edward Fredkin, he concludes that the universe itself would then be an automaton, like a giant computer. I I cant believe that anyone seriously thinks the universe *is* a computer,(especially scientists) but yes, it is a system, and yes, people tend to see /understand new things in terms of what they know or believe true and associate them to what they recognise as familiar , a well established fact in cognitive science S Weinberg, : "Wolfram himself is a lapsed elementary _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Digital Ontology and digital ontology, Azamat |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] cyclic and acyclic definitions, Azamat |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Digital Ontology and digital ontology, Azamat |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Digital Ontology and digital ontology, Doug McDavid |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |