[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Relevance of Aristotelian Logic

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Александр Шкотин <alex.shkotin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:15:10 +0300
Message-id: <b24945a10902141015g61467518n1a9cf12edb011f9a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
it seems that "single universal ontology" for usual life should be more or less simple.
do we have one in formal form somewhere?

And by the way, this illustrates another reason why a single
universal ontology would not be used for practical applications.
To be truly universal, the ontology would have to be stated at
the most fundamental level possible.  But that level is likely
to be too complex for practical computation.  (Just look at
quantum electrodynamics or string theory, for example.)


Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>