Pat, (01)
> However, I would prefer that we reserve the word
>"ontology" for the axioms (or whatever we call the things in the
>various boxes), not for this more amorphous notion of "axioms plus
>grounding", as I have absolutely no idea how to make sense, with this
>latter interpretation, of the phrase "ontology engineering" :-)
>
>PatH (02)
Don't you think this is bit like not including foundation in building
engineering or not including geology in bridge engineering. What would be the
point of such ontology engineering? (03)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (04)
|