| To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| From: | "Deborah MacPherson" <debmacp@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 1 May 2008 20:59:37 -0400 |
| Message-id: | <48f213f30805011759w3854a06dk80393b38714b8ccd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
- tactical reasons - using word someone understands when trying to
communicate with them - something to "ontology" not captured - explicate that difference reasonably precisely
- setting standards makes it seem worth mapping out a whole history of this troublesome word. _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontology vs OWL implementation, Pat Hayes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Heterarchy & Hierarchy, oh my my, ZENG, MARCIA |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontology vs OWL implementation, Pat Hayes |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontology vs OWL implementation, Christopher Spottiswoode |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |