To: | "Christopher Spottiswoode" <cms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Cc: | "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
From: | Pat Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 1 May 2008 23:34:58 +0200 |
Message-id: | <p06230919c43fe4a8f77d@[192.168.8.171]> |
At 9:45 PM +0200 5/1/08, Christopher Spottiswoode wrote:
Pat, Bill, I wish people would get clear that there are TWO senses of the
word 'ontology', with almost no useful or interesting relationship
between them. One, the older sense, is philosophical, where it means
something like 'concerned with reality' (as opposed to, for example,
epistemics, which is concerned with beliefs, and phenomenology, which
is concerned with impressions and experience). The other sense, much
newer, is that in which an ontology (a phrase which is hardly
meaningful using the earlier sense) is a formalized theory. All of
this forum and all of these threads are concerned with ontologies in
the second sense, which is NOT the first sense. Only ontologies in the
second sense can be engineered.
It is a great pity that such a useful word got co-opted in this
way, but these things happen. Its too late now to do anything about
it.
That's very useful to dictators for browbeating the innocent Oh, bullshit. The only authority Im claiming, even implicitly,
stems from years doing AI KR work, which has now gotten re-christened
(and not by me).
Pat
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC 40 South Alcaniz St. Pensacola FL 32502 http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.flickr.com/pathayes/collections _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontology vs OWL implementation, Bill Andersen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontology vs OWL implementation, Pat Hayes |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontology vs OWL implementation, Christopher Spottiswoode |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontology vs OWL implementation, Christopher Spottiswoode |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |