Thank you, Sven. (01)
> [SVP] the need for ontologies to increase efficiency and efficacy in data
> management and communication is clear. However, the ontolog(y) community
> should be aware that tools, pathways and protocols are urgently needed to
> bridge the gap between the knowledge available in communities of practice
> and the preparation of this knowledge for ontology engineers. (02)
[ppy] Well said, Sven. Maybe this is where a community of practice
for *ontology practitioners* (a la "Ontolog") can come into play, and
its members (you and I included) have a role to play -- tapping into
each others knowledge and experience and applying them (others'
knowledge and experience) to their (individual members') own domain. (03)
> [SVP] Use a wiki or something similar seems not a good answer
> considering the realistic lack of computer and ict knowledge by
> most professionals in their highly professional environment (such
> as nurses on intensive care). I really hope some constructive
> solutions can be developed for this 'neglected problem'. (04)
[ppy] I don't think any single tool would fit the bill (whether it is
the wiki, or the browser, or the telephone, or even the natural
language.) I guess we just have to start somewhere and keep improving. (05)
Cheers. =ppy
-- (06)
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Sven Van Poucke
<svanpoucke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear Peter,
>
> I thank you for your honest reply. I appreciate your efforts and
> interventions at ontolog (while driving to the hospital I am working as
> anaesthetist and listening to the previous podcasts). From a
> not-even-novice-in-ontology scientific point of view, the need for
> ontologies to increase efficiency and efficacy in data management and
> communication is clear. However, the ontolog(y) community should be aware
> that tools, pathways and protocols are urgently needed to bridge the gap
> between the knowledge available in communities of practice and the
> preparation of this knowledge for ontology engineers. Practically this could
> be translated in tools where consensus could be reached on definitions and
> words used during professional life. Use a wiki or something similar seems
> not a good answer considering the realistic lack of computer and ict
> knowledge by most professionals in their highly professional environment
> (such as nurses on intensive care). I really hope some constructive
> solutions can be developed for this 'neglected problem'.
>
> Cheers
>
> SvenVanPoucke
> Co-ordinator Woundontology Consortium (07)
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: peter.yim@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:peter.yim@xxxxxxxxx] Namens Peter Yim
> Verzonden: dinsdag 22 april 2008 14:01
> Aan: Sven Van Poucke
> Onderwerp: Re: Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
>
> Thank you for the invitation, Sven.
>
> Please allow me to take a rain check. ...[snip]... (08)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (09)
|