To: | "Schiffel, Jeffrey A" <jeffrey.a.schiffel@xxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Cc: | "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
From: | Pat Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 4 Mar 2008 11:26:00 -0600 |
Message-id: | <p06230908c3f334df4c7c@[10.100.0.20]> |
At 11:12 AM -0600 3/4/08, Schiffel, Jeffrey A wrote:
> From: Alexander Garcia Castro Careful. In one (widely accepted) sense of 'definition', most
ontologies are written in languages which do not support definitions.
(Examples: RDF, UML, OWL, Common Logic)
and the OK, but now things get confused. There are several distinct ideas
here:
If two agents, each using an ontology, cannot exchange terms that can be ? What exactly do you mean by 'fitted into'? OWL, RDF and CL
*always* allow for exchange of terms, so this notion of
'fitting' must mean more than simply "adding to".
, then they must be using different, non-overlapping ontologies. These two ontologies would So 'orthogonal' simply means 'different' ? Is that really what you mean to say? No term or relation in one ontology would have meaning in That is a different idea altogether. In OWL, for example, any
term in any ontology can be said to 'have meaning' in any other
ontology (that is, assertions involving it can be added to the other
ontology and entailments can be drawn from them together.) The same is
true for most forms of conventional logical ontology languages.
The ontologies would be mutually exclusive. In what sense of 'exclusive'? Do you mean they would be mutually
inconsistent? Because that is yet a third idea, and the claim seems
false.
Pat
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC 40 South Alcaniz St. Pensacola FL 32502 http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.flickr.com/pathayes/collections _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] orthogonal, Ed Barkmeyer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] orthogonal, Alan Ruttenberg |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] orthogonal, Schiffel, Jeffrey A |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] orthogonal, Ed Barkmeyer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |