ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Time representation

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Pat Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:04:18 -0600
Message-id: <p06230909c3be9e4ff64d@[10.100.0.38]>
At 5:51 PM +0000 1/24/08, <matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Dear Pat,
>
>I think you are misunderstanding Paola's real point.
>
>>  At 4:35 PM +0700 1/24/08, paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>>  >RANT/
>>  >The important role of speculative enquiry is accepted to some extent,
>>  >but a lot of effort imho is spent on research (done with
>>  public money)
>>  >that is not useful (enough) nor applied , or  only benefits the
>>  >researchers and their private clients.
>>  >Research funded with public money should benefit the public at large
>
>MW: What I take from this, with some inside knowledge of how EC
>funding sometimes seems to work, is that at least some EC funded
>research projects seem to do little more than support organizations that
>appear to be set up to exploit the opportunities to gain EC research
>funding.    (01)

Of course. This happens everywhere. But those 
organizations have people in them, and its the 
people who do the research. I don't really give a 
damn about the nature of the organization: that 
is just people playing at being managers in any 
case.    (02)

>There being little useful research, and what there is, not
>being publicly available.    (03)

That is a different issue. I'm surprised that the 
EC doesn't make open publication mandatory for 
supported 'pure' research, in fact: even the 
military and intelligence agencies do over here.    (04)

>  Whilst this is supposed to be OK because
>it provides seedcorn for small and start-up type companies, there are
>notably few companies that have really "made it" with an EC funded
>start.    (05)

Im not interested in seeding companies. We were 
talking about research, not companies.    (06)

>  >
>>  Bullshit. This is like the standard American right-wing fantasy that
>>  the government is "spending our money". The purpose of research is to
>>  investigate new areas of knowledge. The benefits, if any, to this
>>  mythical entity called "the public at large" may or may not accrue
>>  downstream, but to demand immediate 'relevance' (to what, exactly?)
>>  is to cripple research. Experience suggests that it is worth
>>  investing a substantial fraction of a group's or society's available
>>  effort into pure research, undertaken for no other reason than to
>>  find something out. For technology companies, the ideal fraction
>>  seems to be about 20%, for example (Xerox, Google, HP); for a nation
>>  Im not sure of the appropriate figure, but right now the USA is way
>>  below par, and its economy is suffering in large part because of that.
>
>MW: And I suspect both Paola and I would agree, especially if the
>results of the research were publicly available - where they had been
>publicly funded.
>
>MW: As an aside, I have noticed that often the best research is
>slightly underfunded. This forces collaboration and invention. Large
>research projects with large budgets only guarantee to spend the
>budget.    (07)

Hmm. Tell that to the physicists or the astronomers.    (08)

OK, no more political ranting from me on this forum.    (09)

Pat    (010)

>
>Regards
>
>Matthew West
>Reference Data Architecture and Standards Manager
>Shell International Petroleum Company Limited
>Registered in England and Wales
>Registered number: 621148
>Registered office: Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA, United Kingdom
>
>Tel: +44 20 7934 4490 Mobile: +44 7796 336538
>Email: matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx
>http://www.shell.com
>http://www.matthew-west.org.uk/
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
>Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
>Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
>Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>    (011)


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC            (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.    (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                       (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                        (850)291 0667    cell
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes    (012)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (013)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>