To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Waclaw Kusnierczyk <Waclaw.Marcin.Kusnierczyk@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:59:21 +0200 |
Message-id: | <46719E19.9080809@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Pat Hayes wrote: > to make sense of this. The OWL semantics doesn't > mention concepts anywhere. So where do the (01) here: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/ six occurrences. (02) vQ (03) _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (04) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] to concept or not to concept, is this a question?, Conklin, Don |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] to concept or not to concept, is this a question?, Waclaw Kusnierczyk |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] to concept or not to concept, is this a question?, Pat Hayes |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] to concept or not to concept, is this a question?, Pat Hayes |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |