FWIW, the chandler folks [1] are releasing an OSS (Java, JCR-based) web
calendar that might augment this process.
Jack
[1] http://cosmo.osafoundation.org/ (01)
Peter Yim wrote:
> Thank you, Evan & Denise. Yes, yes, yes ... indeed!
>
> We want both the ability to leverage the meta-data, ... also and
> continue to provide the ease of use ("contribution" by anyone and
> everyone, easily, if they want to).
>
> Max Voelkel made a post at the OntologizingOntolog page
> (http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologizingOntolog#nidOMM )
> on 2006.07.24 referring us to the SemWiki2006 work. Max Voekel is
> from York Sure's team at
> University of Karlsruhe, Germany. As announced earlier, York will be
> speaking ot the Ontolog Forum on 8/17/2006 (ref:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2006_08_17) ...
> I'm positive that it is going to be a very interesting session. We can
> explore the various alternatives further then.
>
> Regards. =ppy
> --
>
>
> On 8/7/06, dbedford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <dbedford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Evan,
>>
>> Good suggestion. I think we also need to include the event
>> information in
>> our Taxo-Thesaurus content coverage. My apologies to the group for
>> having
>> to be 'off line' for the last week on that project. Perhaps it is
>> time to
>> begin discussing how we will manage the Taxo-Thesaurus generated
>> metadata.
>> RDF is a logical option.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Denise
>
>
> On 8/7/06, ewallace@xxxxxxxxxxxx <ewallace@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Peter,
>>
>> On the way home the other day, I had an alternative thought about the
>> Events calendar. It is a "What if..." sort of a wish rather than a
>> recommendation.
>>
>> Suppose this information were kept as RDF data. It could be maintained
>> as a set of triples containing all the event data without concern for
>> order or presentation. Then different pages could simply provide
>> different views of this data, presenting only the data meeting some
>> criteria and ordering and formatting that data as appropriate for the
>> view. I'm not sure what advantages RDF would bring vs a relational DB
>> and SQL for this sort of approach, but it is closer to "eating our own
>> dog food" and is designed specifically for web use.
>>
>> Just a bit of in car day dreaming.
>>
>> -Evan (02)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (03)
|