ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [ontolog-forum] UBL Project Status / Proposed Telecon

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "William E. McCarthy" <mccarth4@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 07:55:43 EST
Message-id: <200303101255.h2ACtix22034@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Like John Yunker and Monica Martin, I will be occupied at 
the UN/CEFACT Forum during the proposed telecon.  I 
assume details will be published to the list.    (01)

Bill McCarthy    (02)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter P. Yim [mailto:yimpp@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 10:19 AM
> To: [ontolog-forum]
> Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] UBL Project Status / 
Proposed Telecon
> 
>  > but how do you plan to implement the telecom?
> 
> 1. We're planning to use <freeconference.com> (see 
> http://www.freeconference.com ) where a conference line 
and an PIN 
> will be set up (it'll be a number in the US) so that 
everybody can 
> just call that number at the prescribed time. Everybody 
will be paying 
> for their own call at whatever LD charges they may 
ordinarily incur. 
> Once we've finalize the time, I'll set up the call, and 
those who 
> responded positively will get a separate e-mail 
invitation with the 
> details. I'll post the call details too (for people who 
decides to 
> join at the last minute).
> 
> 2. ** Please respond before end-of-day Mon 3.10.03 if 
possible, so 
> that I know roughly how many lines we need to reserve.
> 
> 3. I can/will also set up a shared screen/shared 
application session 
> on VNC, for those who can have access to a Internet 
browser (and is 
> not behind a prohibiting firewall configuration) during 
the call.
> 
> 4. If people have things to share, it is best that they 
post email or 
> wiki) or upload (ftp) it to our shared file area prior 
to the call so 
> that people who are NOT on the shared screen can be 
viewing them in 
> parallel too.
> [ Please ref. 
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/2003-
03/msg00039.html ]
> 
> Regards,
> PPY
> --
> 
> Patrick Cassidy wrote:
> > The time slot is fine for me, but how do you plan to 
implement
> > the telecom?  I have no telecom tools at present.  If 
there
> > will be a web site that one can view, that's fine. 
Otherwise,
> > can someone suggest a telecom program and hardware 
that won't
> > break a tiny budget?
> > 
> >    Pat
> > ========================
> 
> > MDaconta@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > 
> >> In a message dated 3/7/2003 12:40:48 AM US Mountain 
Standard Time, 
> >> conrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> >>
> >>> I also propose that we hold a kickoff 
teleconference relatively soon,
> >>> preferably Wednesday, March 12th. At this time, two 
time-slots are
> >>> available: 10:30-12:00 PST (1:30-3:00 EST) or 1:00-
2:30 PST
> >>> (4:00-5:30 EST).
> >>>
> >>> How many of you could attend a telecon next 
Wednesday?  Which time
> >>> would be prefable?
> 
> >> Count me in on the telecon.  1:30-3:00pm EST is 
better for me.
> >>
> >> - Mike
> >> -------------------------------
> >> Michael C. Daconta
> 
> 
__________________________________________________________
_______
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-
forum/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ 
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  
> 
__________________________________________________________
_______
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-
forum/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
>     (03)



-- 
William E. McCarthy
Michigan State University    (04)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ 
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/  To Post: 
mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (05)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>