Sure, Pat. (01)
By your terminology, then, this will be a "conference call", augmented
by a "shared computer screen" (for some/most of the participants.) (02)
-ppy
-- (03)
Patrick Cassidy wrote:
> OK, please allot a slot for me.
> On terminology:
> (1) if this is a purely voice telephone conference, I would
> prefer that we call it a "conference call"
> (2) if it includes provision for a video feed, I would
> call it a "video conference"
> From your reply, I assume it's a voice-only conference
> call. I am unfamiliar with the usage of "telecon" --
> (a sheltered life). I hate to be picky about terminology --
> but I seem to be the only one who was uncertain about the
> usage.
>
> Pat
>
> ========================= (04)
> Peter P. Yim wrote:
>
>> > but how do you plan to implement the telecon?
>>
>> 1. We're planning to use <freeconference.com> (see
>> http://www.freeconference.com ) where a conference line and an PIN
>> will be set up (it'll be a number in the US) so that everybody can
>> just call that number at the prescribed time. Everybody will be paying
>> for their own call at whatever LD charges they may ordinarily incur.
>> Once we've finalize the time, I'll set up the call, and those who
>> responded positively will get a separate e-mail invitation with the
>> details. I'll post the call details too (for people who decides to
>> join at the last minute).
>>
>> 2. ** Please respond before end-of-day Mon 3.10.03 if possible, so
>> that I know roughly how many lines we need to reserve.
>>
>> 3. I can/will also set up a shared screen/shared application session
>> on VNC, for those who can have access to a Internet browser (and is
>> not behind a prohibiting firewall configuration) during the call.
>>
>> 4. If people have things to share, it is best that they post email or
>> wiki) or upload (ftp) it to our shared file area prior to the call so
>> that people who are NOT on the shared screen can be viewing them in
>> parallel too.
>> [ Please ref.
>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/2003-03/msg00039.html ]
>>
>> Regards,
>> PPY
>> -- (05)
>> Patrick Cassidy wrote:
>>
>>> The time slot is fine for me, but how do you plan to implement
>>> the telecom? I have no telecom tools at present. If there
>>> will be a web site that one can view, that's fine. Otherwise,
>>> can someone suggest a telecom program and hardware that won't
>>> break a tiny budget?
>>>
>>> Pat
>>> ======================== (06)
>>> MDaconta@xxxxxxx wrote:
>>>
>>>> In a message dated 3/7/2003 12:40:48 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
>>>> conrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>>>>
>>>>> I also propose that we hold a kickoff teleconference relatively soon,
>>>>> preferably Wednesday, March 12th. At this time, two time-slots are
>>>>> available: 10:30-12:00 PST (1:30-3:00 EST) or 1:00-2:30 PST
>>>>> (4:00-5:30 EST).
>>>>>
>>>>> How many of you could attend a telecon next Wednesday? Which time
>>>>> would be prefable?
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> Count me in on the telecon. 1:30-3:00pm EST is better for me.
>>>>
>>>> - Mike
>>>> -------------------------------
>>>> Michael C. Daconta (07)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (08)
|