[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] UBL Project Status / Proposed Telecon

To: cassidy@xxxxxxxxx, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Peter P. Yim" <yimpp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 12:59:58 -0800
Message-id: <3E69084E.2010607@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sure, Pat.    (01)

By your terminology, then, this will be a "conference call", augmented 
by a "shared computer screen" (for some/most of the participants.)    (02)

--     (03)

Patrick Cassidy wrote:
> OK, please allot a slot for me.
>   On terminology:
>   (1) if this is a purely voice telephone conference, I would
>        prefer that we call it a "conference call"
>   (2)  if it includes provision for a video feed, I would
>         call it a "video conference"
>    From your reply, I assume it's a voice-only conference
> call.    I am unfamiliar with the usage of "telecon" --
> (a sheltered life).  I hate to be picky about terminology --
> but I seem to be the only one who was uncertain about the
> usage.
>    Pat
> =========================    (04)

> Peter P. Yim wrote:
>>  > but how do you plan to implement the telecon?
>> 1. We're planning to use <freeconference.com> (see 
>> http://www.freeconference.com ) where a conference line and an PIN 
>> will be set up (it'll be a number in the US) so that everybody can 
>> just call that number at the prescribed time. Everybody will be paying 
>> for their own call at whatever LD charges they may ordinarily incur. 
>> Once we've finalize the time, I'll set up the call, and those who 
>> responded positively will get a separate e-mail invitation with the 
>> details. I'll post the call details too (for people who decides to 
>> join at the last minute).
>> 2. ** Please respond before end-of-day Mon 3.10.03 if possible, so 
>> that I know roughly how many lines we need to reserve.
>> 3. I can/will also set up a shared screen/shared application session 
>> on VNC, for those who can have access to a Internet browser (and is 
>> not behind a prohibiting firewall configuration) during the call.
>> 4. If people have things to share, it is best that they post email or 
>> wiki) or upload (ftp) it to our shared file area prior to the call so 
>> that people who are NOT on the shared screen can be viewing them in 
>> parallel too.
>> [ Please ref. 
>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/2003-03/msg00039.html ]
>> Regards,
>> PPY
>> --     (05)

>> Patrick Cassidy wrote:
>>> The time slot is fine for me, but how do you plan to implement
>>> the telecom?  I have no telecom tools at present.  If there
>>> will be a web site that one can view, that's fine. Otherwise,
>>> can someone suggest a telecom program and hardware that won't
>>> break a tiny budget?
>>>    Pat
>>> ========================    (06)

>>> MDaconta@xxxxxxx wrote:
>>>> In a message dated 3/7/2003 12:40:48 AM US Mountain Standard Time, 
>>>> conrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>>>>> I also propose that we hold a kickoff teleconference relatively soon,
>>>>> preferably Wednesday, March 12th. At this time, two time-slots are
>>>>> available: 10:30-12:00 PST (1:30-3:00 EST) or 1:00-2:30 PST
>>>>> (4:00-5:30 EST).
>>>>> How many of you could attend a telecon next Wednesday?  Which time
>>>>> would be prefable?
>>>> Count me in on the telecon.  1:30-3:00pm EST is better for me.
>>>> - Mike
>>>> -------------------------------
>>>> Michael C. Daconta    (07)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ 
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (08)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>