To: | adampease@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Upper Ontology Summit convention <uos-convene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | bateman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: | Wed, 8 Mar 2006 19:01:41 +0100 |
Message-id: | <1141840901.440f1c057decd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Adam, (01) you mentioned just now in the telecon some overheads that you used yesterday (?) to illustrate irreparable incompatibility between SUMO and DOLCE. Since you were last in Bremen 2-3 years ago we have been working more or less continuously on issues of relating deeply axiomatised ontologies. I would be interested in seeing the examples that you used so that we could consider how we would be going about relating these incompatibilities with our kinds of tools. This might make some of the discussion more concrete when it comes to what may or may not come out of the exercise of relating ontologies and also help relate to the other initiatives and actions in this direction. (02) Could you send a pointer to the overheads? Best, John B. (03) _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uos-convene/ To Post: mailto:uos-convene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UpperOntologySummit/uos-convene/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UpperOntologySummit (04) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [uos-convene] A common subset ontology?, John F. Sowa |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [uos-convene] A common subset ontology?, Chris Menzel |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [uos-convene] A common subset ontology?, John F. Sowa |
Next by Thread: | Re: [uos-convene]: Relating ontologies, Adam Pease |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |