Dear Pat, (01)
You suggest some elements that might be part of a common subset. Most of
these are things that lie below the 3D/4D line and can be given an
interpretation either way by inclusion with a suitable upper ontology.
They are very much in the territory of what I think can be usefully
shared. (02)
See a few specific comments. (03)
<snip>
>
> The elements one would hope to be present in a common subset are those
> most commonly used in domain ontologies, such as person, organization, (04)
MW: Yes. (05)
> time, space, (06)
MW: Time and space looks rather different in 4D, so this will probably
need mapping. (07)
> artifacts, locations, agents, parts, (08)
MW: Yes (we have a lot of types of artifact). (09)
> causality, (010)
MW: Not sure. (011)
> grammatical roles in events, (012)
MW: Could you explain what you mean further? (013)
> and the sorts of things that are
> extracted
> by "named entity" recognition programs. (014)
MW: Don't understand this either. Could you give further explanation? (015)
> The more the better. (016)
MW: I would add physical properties and units of measure. (017)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uos-convene/
To Post: mailto:uos-convene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UpperOntologySummit/uos-convene/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UpperOntologySummit (018)
|