uos-convene
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [uos-convene] Endorsements

To: "'Upper Ontology Summit convention'" <uos-convene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Schoening, James R C-E LCMC CIO/G6" <James.Schoening@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:13:16 -0500
Message-id: <5F6E70D8ED5D274F9D9A721485C0A4620D5919C1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
All,    (01)

        How's this sound for a statement supporters could endorse?    (02)

        "A common upper ontology is essential for achieving affordable and 
scalable semantic interoperability.  Summit participants will explore 
alternative approaches to developing or establishing this common upper 
ontology."     (03)

        The first line is a quote from Steve Ray's draft communique.      (04)

        We don't have consensus on 'how' to get to this ontology.  This summit 
should explore the alternate approaches and which ones each participant is in a 
position (and willing) to pursue.       (05)

Jim Schoening    (06)






-----Original Message-----
From: uos-convene-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:uos-convene-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of West, Matthew R 
SIPC-DFD/321
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 6:43 AM
To: Upper Ontology Summit convention
Subject: RE: [uos-convene] Endorsements    (07)

Dear Colleagues,    (08)

Well I know I can support that since Shell and EPISTLE have been doing that for 
some time now.    (09)


Regards    (010)

Matthew West
Reference Data Architecture and Standards Manager Shell International Petroleum 
Company Limited Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA, United Kingdom    (011)

Tel: +44 20 7934 4490 Mobile: +44 7796 336538
Email: matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx
http://www.shell.com
http://www.matthew-west.org.uk/    (012)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: uos-convene-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:uos-convene-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Uschold, 
> Michael F
> Sent: 28 February 2006 03:00
> To: Upper Ontology Summit convention
> Subject: [uos-convene] Endorsements
> 
> 
> Organizations are being asked to endorse an UO effort.
> This needs to be precise, if I can possibly get Boeing to sign off.
> 
> Here is proposed text that might be workable: 
> 
> "We believe that efforts to standardize upper ontologies is valuable."
> 
> If we want to say much more, we should have a concise statement of our
> objective(s) that define the effort that organizations are endorsing.
> 
> Mike
> 
>  _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uos-convene/
> To Post: mailto:uos-convene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ Shared Files:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UpperOntologySummit/uos-convene/
> Community Wiki: 
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UpperOntologySummit
> 
>     (013)

 _________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uos-convene/
To Post: mailto:uos-convene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UpperOntologySummit/uos-convene/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UpperOntologySummit
 _________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uos-convene/
To Post: mailto:uos-convene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UpperOntologySummit/uos-convene/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UpperOntologySummit    (014)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>