To: | "uom-ontology-std" <uom-ontology-std@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | "Rijgersberg, Hajo" <Hajo.Rijgersberg@xxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 4 Sep 2009 12:41:58 +0200 |
Message-id: | <81FED4D03D7F594E8CB22C6F42E6DA8501771190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Dear all,
Please allow me to make a remark about quantity
kinds. Hopefully this discussion is appreciated; it is solely meant to
be constructive, with the aim of working together to achieve a high-quality
vocabulary.
Let me get to the point. I think we should not
define a separate class "quantity kind". "Kind" is an implicit part of the ontology language;
classes are meant to model "kinds". We should not deviate from this
principle, but exploit it.
So not, for example:
"length of my table" ---"has quantity kind"--->
"length"
"length of my table" ---"is a"--->
"quantity"
"length" ---"is a"---> "quantity kind" but:
"length of my table" ---"is a"---> "length
(quantity)"
"length (quantity)" ---"is a"--->
"quantity"
Best regards, Hajo
Rijgersberg _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uom-ontology-std/ Subscribe: mailto:uom-ontology-std-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/uom-ontology-std/ Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UoM/ Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UoM_Ontology_Standard (01) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Next by Date: | Re: [uom-ontology-std] FW: Quantity kinds, David Leal |
---|---|
Next by Thread: | Re: [uom-ontology-std] FW: Quantity kinds, Ed Barkmeyer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |