On Jul 15, 2009, at 7:00 PM, Ed Barkmeyer wrote:    (01)
> James Davenport wrote:
>
>> Personally, I'm not sure that I would give 'length' and 'width'
>> different kinds, but that's why we will (when we actually get down to
>> talking about populating the ontology) be having these debates. Two
>> better examples are torque and energy,
>
> Torque and energy are different kinds of quantity, and their instances
> are not comparable.  The confusion here arises from the fact that they
> differ in their dimensional formulations by multiplication by a kind  
> of
> quantity (angle) that has no "unit".  (Its model is arc length/radius,
> i.e. length/length.)    (02)
It always bothered me that dimensional analysis made angles  
dimensionless, when they are of such profound physical significance.  
Clearly, direction of length matters. The fact is, 'length' should be  
treated as a vector rather than a scalar. This also, btw, helps with  
distinguishing length from width from height. BUt this is probably  
going too far out in left field for this forum :-)    (03)
>
>> or the distinction between relative and non-relative temperatures
>
> Pandora's box number 2.  Absolute temperatures (which is the usual  
> kind)
> and date-time are very special problems.  They don't work like other
> measurements.    (04)
Date/time is a mess because the scales aren't additive (months screw  
things up), but the underlying model of time-intervals is quite  
coherent. Temperature is interesting: another dimensionless  
dimension :-)    (05)
PatH    (06)
>
> -Ed
>
> -- 
> Edward J. Barkmeyer                        Email: edbark@xxxxxxxx
> National Institute of Standards & Technology
> Manufacturing Systems Integration Division
> 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8263                Tel: +1 301-975-3528
> Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8263                FAX: +1 301-975-4694
>
> "The opinions expressed above do not reflect consensus of NIST,
>  and have not been reviewed by any Government authority."
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uom-ontology-std/
> Subscribe: mailto:uom-ontology-std-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/uom-ontology-std/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UoM/
> Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UoM_Ontology_Standard
>
>
>    (07)
------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes    (08)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uom-ontology-std/  
Subscribe: mailto:uom-ontology-std-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/uom-ontology-std/  
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UoM/  
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UoM_Ontology_Standard    (09)
 
 |