Till, (01)
> [TillMo] In the OOR instance http://socop.oor.net, the categories are
> (exhaustive list): Commercial, Cultural, Defense, Financial, Geospatial,
> Government, Literature, Metadata, Other, Process, Provenance,
> Science, Social Networking, Standards, Technology, Upper Ontologies.
> I now just wonder what we should do for Ontohub. (02)
[ppy] This is one of the OOR customizations (on the BioPortal vm
package) for a general (non-domain specific) OOR instance. Besides the
SOCoP-OOR instance, you will find the same on the OOR-sandbox instance
too ( http://sandbox.oor.net ) (03)
Ref. http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OOR_SandBox_Customization#nid317J
We had some discussion on this (as you can see in the reference, where
MikeDean initiated this customization) in earlier OOR sessions (back
in 2011). If your repository is for a specific domain (like BioPortal,
or say, even SOCoP) you might want to provide finer grain
categorization. If your repository is not domain specific, then this
should be (at least) a good starting point. (04)
Regards. =ppy
-- (05)
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Till Mossakowski
<Till.Mossakowski@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am 29.05.2013 00:29, schrieb John F Sowa:
>> On 5/28/2013 4:27 PM, Till Mossakowski wrote:
>>> After all, the user wants to use *one* ontology or classification
>>> system for classifying ontologies.
>>
>> What do you mean "one classification system"?
>
> In BioPortal, when the user uploads a new ontology, (s)he can provide
> some categories classifying the ontology. When browsing all ontologies,
> you can also filter them by category.
> The possible categories are: Animal Development, Biological Process,
> Human, Plant, Yeast, Cell etc. (Btw, not all categories returned by the
> REST service can be selected for browsing.)
> The OOR instance http://mercury-ncbo.ornl.gov seems to (erroneously) use
> the same categories
> In the OOR instance http://socop.oor.net, the categories are (exhaustive
> list): Commercial, Cultural, Defense, Financial, Geospatial, Government,
> Literature, Metadata, Other, Process, Provenance, Science, Social
> Networking, Standards, Technology, Upper Ontologies.
> I now just wonder what we should do for Ontohub.
>
>> The number of different kinds of ontologies, their purposes,
>> goals, applications, levels, logics, notations, uses, etc.,
>> is open-ended.
>>
>> Suppose that somebody asked you to compare Cyc to BFO to the Good
>> Relations ontology to schema.org. Where would you begin? And why?
>
> It is not about comparing ontologies. It is just that the "filter by
> category" dropdown box on the browsing web page needs to show a finite
> list of options to the user...
>
> Best, Till
>
> --
> Prof. Dr. Till Mossakowski Cartesium, room 2.51 Phone +49-421-218-64226
> DFKI GmbH Bremen Fax +49-421-218-9864226
> Cyber-Physical Systems Till.Mossakowski@xxxxxxx
> Enrique-Schmidt-Str. 5, D-28359 Bremen
> http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~till/
>
> Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH
> principal office, *not* the address for mail etc.!!!:
> Trippstadter Str. 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern
> management board: Prof. Wolfgang Wahlster (chair), Dr. Walter Olthoff
> supervisory board: Prof. Hans A. Aukes (chair)
> Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
> Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
> Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository (07)
|