|From:||Cameron Ross <cross@xxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:31:30 -0400|
The title of yesterday's session was "Getting OOR Development Going - Take-IV". If we don't have deliverables then what exactly are we developing and why are we compelled to get it "going"?
I think that you are confusing "commitment" with "deliverable". Although there is no explicit funding commitment as yet, the group is, in fact, delivering work products. For example, Ken's WSDL and WADL definitions of the BioPortal API and his recent architectural document
Based on the discussion in this thread thus far, it looks like the deliverables are:
1) An architectural specification of the OOR.
2) A production quality implementation of the OOR.
We can commit to a specific set of deliverables. However, these commitments will probably be soft commitments given that there is no explicit funding.
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Cameron and All,
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/ Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/ Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/ Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [oor-forum] OOR Deliverable, Cameron Ross|
|Next by Date:||[oor-forum] OOR common resources, Cameron Ross|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [oor-forum] OOR Deliverable, Peter Yim|
|Next by Thread:||[oor-forum] Ontolog v. OOR Deliverable [was Re: OOR Deliverable], Peter Yim|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|