On 1 Feb 2014, at 23:59, Amanda Vizedom
wrote:
In my experience, that just isn't
true.
In our experience, that is 100 percent true :-) The model+SPARQL
is so complex that we have enough trouble debugging even using
human-readable URIs. No way we'd meet our delivery deadlines if we made it
harder - so we don't, and won't.
In this thread, there's lots of "the tool should do x" and "we can
dereference" and "why don't you just add search of labels into your SPARQL",
etc.
My response is that the entire point of this conversation was to
discuss characteristics that make ontologies more reusable. Imposing
expectations on how people will use the ontologies or imposing your own
expectations on the tooling they must use is clearly a barrier to reuse.
So, if your goal is to create ontologies with the widest possible
audience of potential re-users ... then use human-readable URIs. It's just
that simple. People who don't care about them can ignore them and people who
do can use them.
Ontology developers can, of course, decide if they want to remove an
entire class of use cases/users/tools from their audience or not. For
example, the15926 RDL URI strategy is one that makes none of those classes
or properties directly usable in the kind of app we're development. We do,
of course, relate our ontology under 15926 classes using seeReferenceData
annotations so it's possible for software developers to see the relationship
in case it's useful.
FWIW I was disappointed when the 15926 RDL decisions were being made
10+ years ago, but I was a standards maker then. Matthew's explanation
of how/why the 15926 community made those decisions is also what I remember
... but some of us did complain about that decision even back then because
it was clear to me it would come back to bite someone
eventually. I just never expected that someone to be me :-)
Cheers,
David
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2014/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2014
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/