|To:||Ontology Summit 2012 discussion <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|From:||joseph simpson <jjs0sbw@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:41:36 -0800|
All good points...
The response to these points would depend on context and the value added by the effort to create and maintain the distinctions.
One of my main concerns is the discrete nature of the relationships among concepts in an ontology.
I have explored the application of "variable strength" binding for concept groups.
The key is to find methods that are effective, efficient and practical.
These methods will change from context to context, which proposes yet another "graduation -- value --- pragmatics" problem.
Take care and have fun,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Ali SH <asaegyn+out@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sent From My DROID!!
_________________________________________________________________ Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012 Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontology-summit] ONTOLOGY OF BIG SYSTEMS: Large-scale engineered systems vs. large-scale sociotechnical systems, Jack Park|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontology-summit] [Applications] Launching the conversation about Large-scale Domain Applications, Jack Ring|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontology-summit] Large-scale engineered systems vs. large-scale sociotechnical systems, Ali SH|
|Next by Thread:|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|