Dear Chris and John, (01)
> > I was just looking at the following very nicely written report:
> >
> > http://www.idef.com/pdf/Idef5.pdf
> > Information Integration for Concurrent Engineering
>
> Thanks! ;-)
>
> > It makes a very good case for ontology. The sad part is the
> > date of the report: 1994.
> >
> > What can we tell people (a) that is significantly different from
> > what they said in 1994, and (b) that can explain why we still need
> > to keep saying it seventeen years later? (02)
MW: The main learning from this is that the problem hasn't changed, only the
technology. (03)
Regards (04)
Matthew West
Information Junction
Tel: +44 560 302 3685
Mobile: +44 750 3385279
Skype: dr.matthew.west
matthew.west@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.informationjunction.co.uk/
http://www.matthew-west.org.uk/ (05)
This email originates from Information Junction Ltd. Registered in England
and Wales No. 6632177.
Registered office: 2 Brookside, Meadow Way, Letchworth Garden City,
Hertfordshire, SG6 3JE. (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (07)
|