That is a really thorough document, I printed it out just for the
appendices with all the logic rules. Jans (01)
On 3/25/2011 8:31 AM, John F. Sowa wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I was just looking at the following very nicely written report:
>
> http://www.idef.com/pdf/Idef5.pdf
> Information Integration for Concurrent Engineering
>
> It makes a very good case for ontology. The sad part is the
> date of the report: 1994.
>
> What can we tell people (a) that is significantly different from
> what they said in 1994, and (b) that can explain why we still need
> to keep saying it seventeen years later?
>
> John
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (02)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (03)
|